🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.